It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of theEuropean Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.


The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report, and we suggest our readers – especially the skeptics – read it in its entirety.

One of the most important testimonies on the collapse of the World Trade Towers that was brought to attention in the study comes from the head structural engineer of the towers, John Skilling. It is apparently not enough for skeptics to take the findings of thousands of architects and engineers seriously, but should a skeptic choose not to at least consider the expertise of one of the men who built the WTC towers, then they are purposefully remaining blind.

Every sort of catastrophe that can happen to a high-rise building has to be taken into consideration during the design and construction processes, including the impact of an airplane. According to a 1993 report from The Seattle Times, the Trade Towers were analyzed years ago, after concern was raised over a case where an airplane hit the Empire State Building. It was concluded at the time that the Trade Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707.

In a statement made to The Seattle Times by Skilling:

“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much.” He continues, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane)would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.”

As stated in the study: “In other words, Skilling believed the only mechanism that could bring down the Twin Towers was controlled demolition.” It should be pointed out, as well, that a steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire. And yet on September 11, 2001, three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.

It was on this latter point that the authors concluded their study. They state:

“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.”

Source wakingtimesmedia.com


Leave a Reply
  1. To the eyes that truly saw and more importantly to the senses of a great many people,That inner knowing, that core communication that is Aligned to the unseen,No experiment of scientific level was ever needed..was it.?”.

  2. Fucking bullshit. Gees you americans are gullable twatts. Do your research into MAGNESIUM and magnesium fires…..and the levels of magnesium used in those buildings construction. Idiots !!!

  3. so que es lo que van a hacer ahora con esa infofmacion. van a poder controlar a usa que ataque iraq for su petroleo con esa excusa. no no pueden hacer nada con esa informacion por que no van a poder hacer nada contra el imperio de manipulacion mas grande del mundo.

  4. I work for a company that fire proofs steel framed buildings. Unless this building had no passive fire protection this would not have happened. The burning aircraft fuel would cause a very high temperature, but crucially only for a short time – not long enough to affect the integrity of the steel thick enough to support a building of this strength. Certainly, the building would have burnt, but not collapsed.

  5. 9/11 happen because of two plane hit by both tower,but how its all happen this is mystety,as offical version has many holes,for sure,its highly unlikely some people in mif air highjack the plane and fulfill his plan,no way but which way its a mystery.But both plane had hit to both tower,this is true.Else is bigger mystery?

  6. Can anyone get footage where some firemen (afew) as they walk away from the building’s Say they will be down soon . Ive got it on VIDEO . Same thing with a small hole in the pentagon

    • I’ve been saying this for over a decade. People always look at me like I’m crazy. Most Americans trust our government far too much. Can’t open their eyes to the truth. They think “Why would my government ever lie to me?!” I believe that mental disorder stems from parents making kids believe in Santa Clause. Remember Joey C?

  7. Just read the book ” Men of Steel” , about the family of ironworkers whose company built both towers. They agree it was the melting of the inner core steel around the elevator shafts that caused one floor to collapse , causing a pancake effect.

  8. Everyone that’s a free thinker knows it was a controled demolition
    Hell the owner of CDI said it looked like a controled demolition then the powers that be got ahold of him and all the sudden he says Oh no it wasn’t a controled demolition

    • You should do some more homework yourself no bodies no luggage no engines nothing really to show enough evidence of a plane check out the lady employee who worked there she walked out of the wrecked part of the building and didnt see any evidence of a plane
      Curious to know where you get your facts from

  9. so the planes were a diversion ? hey maybe a stick in the mud but PEOPLE seen the explosions when the planes hit , or all those PEOPLE were wrong , the european scientific journal is a joke , a bad joke at that , or drunk

  10. Many structional engineers, as well as those involved in the design and building of high rise buildings have put forth evidence and theory on how the buildings were destroyed…But, that being said, it will be long after we are all dead before the truth will be revealed…

  11. Not inside job?Explain the following.
    In July 1945, the Empire State Building was hit by a B-25 Bomber
    NEXT >
    FeaturedInstant ArticlesNewsNov 4, 2016

    William Franklin Smith, Jr., was serving as the pilot of a B-25 Mitchell bomber on the morning of July 28, 1945. It was a routine personnel transport mission which involved him flying from Bedford Army Air Field to Newark Airport.

    When he asked for landing clearance, he was told visibility was zero. He continued through the dense fog and become disoriented. Instead of turning left after he passed the Chrysler Building, he turned right.

    Empire State Building
    Empire State Building
    The plane then crashed into the Empire State Building’s north side at 9:40 a.m. just between the 78th and 80th floors. The result was an 18-foot by 20-foot hole in the building. It hit where National Catholic Welfare Council had located its offices.

    One of the plane’s engines shot through the south side of the building, which was opposite from the impact. It reportedly flew as far as a block before dropping 900 feet and landing on the roof of a building, resulting in a fire that destroyed a penthouse art studio.

    The plane’s second engine, along with its landing gear, plummeted down an elevator shaft causing a fire that took 40 minutes to extinguish. It remains the only fire at such a height to be brought under control. There were 14 people killed, including the pilot.

    Christopher Domitrovich and Albert Perna, a Navy aviation machinist’s friend, were all on board the plane plus 11 people who were in the building when the plane struck it. Smith’s body wasn’t recovered until two days later when search crews found that the pilot’s body had gone through an elevator shaft and then fallen to the bottom.

    The plane embedded in the side of the building, 1945
    The plane embedded in the side of the building, 1945
    Betty Lou Oliver, the elevator operator, was injured. Rescuers chose to transport her on another elevator that they didn’t know had cables that were weakened.

    The cables broke, and she survived a fall of 75 stories, which still stands as the longest survived elevator fall in the Guinness Book of World Records.

    Although there was extensive damage and loss of life, the building had many floors reopened for business the following Monday. The missing stone located in the façade serves as evidence of where the aircraft crashed into the side of the building.

    Ads by Revcontent
    Trending Today
    15 WWII Photos They Don’t Show You In History Class
    WrestleDrop© Copyright 2017 – The Vintage News

      • Mr. Cooper then please tell me if it was an inside job who would profit from it? The total expenditure to set up a say false flag incident such as this would be astronomical. From locating these bad actors to play highjackers up to and beyond convincing the son of a multi-billionaire Osama Bin Laden’s family are like the wealthiest construction company in the Near east to become the biggest evil on the planet short of Satan himself, the investment cost overall would not be worth the return and so far if there has been a return on the investment and this was a false flag I have not seen it. So as I stated at the beginning who or what profits from it? Now let us say that it was a real terrorist attack how could three large passenger jets do the damage to collapse the WTCs well first off let us look at the evil genius behind this if it was Bin Laden, is he as so many conservative pundits enjoyed calling him a monster in a dirty night shirt which at least mentality wise was far from the truth Bin Laden held either a Masters or Ph.D. in Structural engineering which gave him the greatest weapon a strong grounding in mathematics. Pair this up with say his access to the internet even sitting in a cave in Kabul as long as he could connect to a satellite via cell phone he could have accessed the structural plans for the WTCs and perhaps the Pentagon. So now he puts his engineering skills to work looking into what each building was constructed from its steel chemical makeup Its structural weak points and the like. If he did plan this and he did not wake up a few month before the incident and say hey let’s do this he would have had to spend several months to perhaps two years or more running via computer laptops and otherwise, thousands of simulations using his knowledge to ascertain which one would bring down the towers with what he had to work with I E two plans carrying this much fuel weighing this much and to precisely strike the WTCs at the correct stress point to bring them down. On a smaller scale, I have been trained in knowing where to strike my enemies body to bring about unconsciousness or immediate death taking down a build in much the same fashion can be done if you know where to hit it at.

  12. Fuck them they weren’t there it’s pretty obvious two planes hit buildings compromised the structure of the buildings the buildings fell ……. The names for people who are conspiracy theorists are dingbat, crackpot, nutcase,screwball look in the mirror and think about what you are saying

  13. Not wanting to argue.
    Are you telling me that the powers that be had demolition experts dressed as business men with all the equipment needed to cut the steels and plant the charges contained in their briefcases? Then all of these demolition business men disappeared without a trace or being noticed whilst working???

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *